Review



g6pase-α #sc-25840 antibody  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology g6pase-α #sc-25840 antibody
    G6pase α #Sc 25840 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/anti+g6pase/pm36791261-76-23-37
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    g6pase-α #sc-25840 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Incubation:

    Article Title: Expression of gluconeogenic enzymes and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in liver of diabetic mice after acute exercise
    Article Snippet: .. Blots were incubated with primary antibody to GR (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), PEPCK (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), 11β-HSD1 (1:1000; Abcam Cambridge, MA, USA), G6Pase α (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA), and G6Pase β (1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) overnight at 4°C. .. To probe for actin, blots were incubated with anti-actin primary antibody (1:5000; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature.

    Article Title: Changes in glucose transporters, gluconeogenesis, and circadian clock after duodenal-jejunal bypass surgery.
    Article Snippet: Background Bariatric surgery improves obesity and ameliorates glucose tolerance.. This study was conducted to evaluate circadian clocks, gluconeogenesis, and glucose transport changes in hepatic and intestinal tissues after duodenal–jejunal bypass (DJB) surgery in a rat model. Methods Twenty-five rats were randomly assigned to either sham group (10 rats) or DJB group (15 rats).. Food intake, body weight, blood glucose, and serum insulin levels were measured.

    other:

    Article Title: Dissociation of Adaptive Thermogenesis from Glucose Homeostasis in Microbiome-Deficient Mice
    Article Snippet: G6Pase-α , Santa Cruz Biotechnology , Cat# sc-25840; RRID: AB_2107514.

    Article Title: Hepatic Insulin Resistance and Altered Gluconeogenic Pathway in Premature Baboons
    Article Snippet: G6Pase , G6Pase- α , Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-258400 , Rabbit; polyclonal , 1:1000.

    Membrane:

    Article Title: Changes in glucose transporters, gluconeogenesis, and circadian clock after duodenal-jejunal bypass surgery.
    Article Snippet: Background Bariatric surgery improves obesity and ameliorates glucose tolerance.. This study was conducted to evaluate circadian clocks, gluconeogenesis, and glucose transport changes in hepatic and intestinal tissues after duodenal–jejunal bypass (DJB) surgery in a rat model. Methods Twenty-five rats were randomly assigned to either sham group (10 rats) or DJB group (15 rats).. Food intake, body weight, blood glucose, and serum insulin levels were measured.

    Saline:

    Article Title: Changes in glucose transporters, gluconeogenesis, and circadian clock after duodenal-jejunal bypass surgery.
    Article Snippet: Background Bariatric surgery improves obesity and ameliorates glucose tolerance.. This study was conducted to evaluate circadian clocks, gluconeogenesis, and glucose transport changes in hepatic and intestinal tissues after duodenal–jejunal bypass (DJB) surgery in a rat model. Methods Twenty-five rats were randomly assigned to either sham group (10 rats) or DJB group (15 rats).. Food intake, body weight, blood glucose, and serum insulin levels were measured.

    Modification:

    Article Title: mTORC2 controls cancer cell survival by modulating gluconeogenesis
    Article Snippet: .. Reagents were obtained from the following sources: torin1 from Tocris Biosciences (Bristol, UK); rapamycin from Calbiochem; MK-2206 from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA); SB-415286 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA); Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin, penicillin/streptomycin and Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA); the complete protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixture from Roche Applied Science (Mannheim, Germany); the antibodies to pan-Akt, phospho-Ser-473 Akt, phospho-Thr-389 S6K1 and phospho-Thr-37/46 4E-BP1 from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA, USA); the antibodies to total 4E-BP1, total S6K1 and PEPCK from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; the PKM1/2 antibody from Thermo (Waltham, MA, USA); and the β -actin antibody from Sigma. siRNA against Raptor, Rictor, PCK1, G6Pase α and scramble siRNA were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All other reagents were from Sigma. ..

    Transfection:

    Article Title: mTORC2 controls cancer cell survival by modulating gluconeogenesis
    Article Snippet: .. Reagents were obtained from the following sources: torin1 from Tocris Biosciences (Bristol, UK); rapamycin from Calbiochem; MK-2206 from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA); SB-415286 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA); Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin, penicillin/streptomycin and Lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA); the complete protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixture from Roche Applied Science (Mannheim, Germany); the antibodies to pan-Akt, phospho-Ser-473 Akt, phospho-Thr-389 S6K1 and phospho-Thr-37/46 4E-BP1 from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA, USA); the antibodies to total 4E-BP1, total S6K1 and PEPCK from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; the PKM1/2 antibody from Thermo (Waltham, MA, USA); and the β -actin antibody from Sigma. siRNA against Raptor, Rictor, PCK1, G6Pase α and scramble siRNA were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All other reagents were from Sigma. ..



    Similar Products

    90
    Moderna mrna encoding g6pase-α
    Mrna Encoding G6pase α, supplied by Moderna, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/mrna+encoding+g6pase+%CE%B1/pmc11842722-473-2-1
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mrna encoding g6pase-α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology g6pase-α #sc-25840 antibody
    G6pase α #Sc 25840 Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/anti+g6pase/pm36791261-76-23-37
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    g6pase-α #sc-25840 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Viva Biotech recombinant g6pase-α protein
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    Recombinant G6pase α Protein, supplied by Viva Biotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/recombinant+g6pase+%CE%B1+protein/pmc08149455-309-16-19
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant g6pase-α protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibody recognizing g6pase-α sc-25840
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    Antibody Recognizing G6pase α Sc 25840, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/anti+g6pase/pmc08373270-142-0-21
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody recognizing g6pase-α sc-25840 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology g6pase-α antibody
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    G6pase α Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/anti+g6pase/pmc07888548-1092-56-61
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    g6pase-α antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology g6pase α
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    G6pase α, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/G6Pase-%CE%B1+(h)-PR/pmc07888548-8-0-2
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    g6pase α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibodies against g6pase α
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    Antibodies Against G6pase α, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/G6Pase-%CE%B1+(h)-PR/pm33052021-60-2-10
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies against g6pase α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    91
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology g6pc
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    G6pc, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/G6Pase-%CE%B1+CRISPR%2FCas9+KO+Plasmid/ppr0159229-50-32-35
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    g6pc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    91/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti-glucose-6-phosphatase-α (g6pase-α)
    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active <t>G6Pase-α</t> enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    Anti Glucose 6 Phosphatase α (G6pase α), supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/g6pase+%CE%B1/anti+g6pase/pm29327229-146-36-38
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-glucose-6-phosphatase-α (g6pase-α) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active G6Pase-α enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23318-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Hypothetical model of h G6PC mRNA therapy. hG6PC mRNAs are delivered to liver via lipid nanoparticles. Once the mRNA is in the cell (hepatocytes) it is translated by the cellular machinery into a functional protein that is localized to the ER membrane (likely following a co-translational translocation model), resulting in an active G6Pase-α enzyme. b Protein consensus screening by ortholog residue analysis. Top: WebLogo representation of the abundance of each alternative amino acid used at indicated residue positions. Bottom: The degree of conservation of amino acids at each position was quantified as relative entropy (Kullback–Leibler divergence). c Relative hG6Pase-α protein expression (solid circle) and hG6Pase-α enzymatic activity (solid square) in HeLa cells treated with the top ten h G6PC mRNA variants generated using protein consensus analysis. Data were shown as percentage of wild-type (WT) group and presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 (for protein expression), 3 (for enzymatic activity, Q247R), or 4 (for enzymatic activity, all other groups) biologically independent samples. d Subcellular localization of WT hG6Pase-α and S298C variant in HeLa cells. Green: hG6Pase-α, Red: Calnexin, an ER marker (top); TOM20, mitochondrial marker (bottom). Scale bars are 10 µm. The ratio of colocalized signal over total signal was calculated by Mander’s colocalization coefficient analysis (bottom panel). Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 2 biologically independent samples. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against G6Pase-α were quantified on Nunc Immuno Maxisorp plates (ThermoFisher, #442404) coated with 0.5 μg/mL recombinant G6Pase-α protein (Viva Biotech) in 50 mM Na 2 CO 3 for 1 h at room temperature and blocked with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (ThermoFisher, #37515).

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Membrane, Translocation Assay, Residue, Expressing, Activity Assay, Generated, Variant Assay, Marker

    a hG6Pase-α protein expression (left panel) and enzymatic activity (right panel) of wild-type hG6PC (WT), codon optimized wild-type h G6PC (WT_CO), hG6PC_S298C (S298C), and codon optimized hG6PC_S298C (S298C_CO) mRNAs evaluated in Hep3B cells. Control cells were treated with eGFP mRNA. Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 3 biologically independent samples. b hG6Pase-α protein expression (left panel) and enzymatic activity (right panel) of WT and codon optimized h G6PC mRNAs as evaluated in male CD-1 mice. Control animals were treated with eGFP mRNA. Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 4 mice. For statistical analysis, raw values were Log2 transformed and subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the non-codon optimized WT hG6PC mRNA. Statistically significant P values ( p ≤ 0.05) are shown in the graphs. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23318-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a hG6Pase-α protein expression (left panel) and enzymatic activity (right panel) of wild-type hG6PC (WT), codon optimized wild-type h G6PC (WT_CO), hG6PC_S298C (S298C), and codon optimized hG6PC_S298C (S298C_CO) mRNAs evaluated in Hep3B cells. Control cells were treated with eGFP mRNA. Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 3 biologically independent samples. b hG6Pase-α protein expression (left panel) and enzymatic activity (right panel) of WT and codon optimized h G6PC mRNAs as evaluated in male CD-1 mice. Control animals were treated with eGFP mRNA. Data were presented as mean ± SD of n = 4 mice. For statistical analysis, raw values were Log2 transformed and subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the non-codon optimized WT hG6PC mRNA. Statistically significant P values ( p ≤ 0.05) are shown in the graphs. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against G6Pase-α were quantified on Nunc Immuno Maxisorp plates (ThermoFisher, #442404) coated with 0.5 μg/mL recombinant G6Pase-α protein (Viva Biotech) in 50 mM Na 2 CO 3 for 1 h at room temperature and blocked with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (ThermoFisher, #37515).

    Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Control, Transformation Assay

    Wild-type (CD-1) male mice were i.v. administered with 1.0 mg/kg of eGFP, h G6PC -wild type (WT), or codon-optimized hG6PC -S298C (hG6PC_S298C_CO) mRNA-LNP and sacrificed at 6, 24, 72, 168, 336 h ( n = 4/group/sacrifice time point). a h G6PC mRNA levels (h G6PC -WT and S298C mRNAs). b Hepatic protein levels in mice treated with eGFP mRNA, mRNA encoding hG6Pase-α WT, or codon-optimized mRNA encoding hG6PC-S298C protein variant. c Hepatic enzymatic activity levels in mice treated with eGFP mRNA, mRNA encoding hG6Pase-α WT, or codon-optimized mRNA encoding hG6PC-S298C protein variant. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3–4). Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23318-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Wild-type (CD-1) male mice were i.v. administered with 1.0 mg/kg of eGFP, h G6PC -wild type (WT), or codon-optimized hG6PC -S298C (hG6PC_S298C_CO) mRNA-LNP and sacrificed at 6, 24, 72, 168, 336 h ( n = 4/group/sacrifice time point). a h G6PC mRNA levels (h G6PC -WT and S298C mRNAs). b Hepatic protein levels in mice treated with eGFP mRNA, mRNA encoding hG6Pase-α WT, or codon-optimized mRNA encoding hG6PC-S298C protein variant. c Hepatic enzymatic activity levels in mice treated with eGFP mRNA, mRNA encoding hG6Pase-α WT, or codon-optimized mRNA encoding hG6PC-S298C protein variant. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3–4). Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against G6Pase-α were quantified on Nunc Immuno Maxisorp plates (ThermoFisher, #442404) coated with 0.5 μg/mL recombinant G6Pase-α protein (Viva Biotech) in 50 mM Na 2 CO 3 for 1 h at room temperature and blocked with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (ThermoFisher, #37515).

    Techniques: Variant Assay, Activity Assay

    a Blood glucose levels following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP in L. G6pc −/− mice. WT, wild-type mice. (WT treated with PBS, n = 8 per group; L.G6 pc −/− treated with eGFP, n = 6, 5, 5, and 5 per group for fasting duration of 0, 2.5, 6, and 24 h, respectively; L.G6 pc −/− treated with h G6PC S298C at 0.2 mg/kg, n = 7 per group for all time points; L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C at 0.5 mg/kg, n = 7, 6, 6, and 6 per group for fasting duration of 0, 2.5, 6, and 24 h, respectively; L.G6 pc −/− treated with h G6PC S298C at 1.0 mg/kg, n = 7 per group for all time points). Data were presented as mean ± SD. b Liver morphology (left panel) and liver weight (right panel) following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA in L. G6pc −/− mice. Representative liver images are shown from n = 8, 5, 7, 6, and 6 mice per group from WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively. c hG6Pase-α S298C protein expression and enzymatic activity in livers of L. G6pc −/− mice. d Hepatic biomarker analysis following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP in L. G6pc −/− mice. Liver G6P (left panel), liver glycogen (middle panel), liver triglycerides (right panel). e Serum triglycerides following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP in L. G6pc −/− mice. h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP dose range: 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg. For b–e , quantitative data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 5, 7, 6, and 6 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). For statistical analysis, raw values were Log2 transformed and subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the eGFP mRNA treated group. Statistically significant P values ( p ≤ 0.05) are shown in the graphs. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23318-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Blood glucose levels following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP in L. G6pc −/− mice. WT, wild-type mice. (WT treated with PBS, n = 8 per group; L.G6 pc −/− treated with eGFP, n = 6, 5, 5, and 5 per group for fasting duration of 0, 2.5, 6, and 24 h, respectively; L.G6 pc −/− treated with h G6PC S298C at 0.2 mg/kg, n = 7 per group for all time points; L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C at 0.5 mg/kg, n = 7, 6, 6, and 6 per group for fasting duration of 0, 2.5, 6, and 24 h, respectively; L.G6 pc −/− treated with h G6PC S298C at 1.0 mg/kg, n = 7 per group for all time points). Data were presented as mean ± SD. b Liver morphology (left panel) and liver weight (right panel) following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA in L. G6pc −/− mice. Representative liver images are shown from n = 8, 5, 7, 6, and 6 mice per group from WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively. c hG6Pase-α S298C protein expression and enzymatic activity in livers of L. G6pc −/− mice. d Hepatic biomarker analysis following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP in L. G6pc −/− mice. Liver G6P (left panel), liver glycogen (middle panel), liver triglycerides (right panel). e Serum triglycerides following administration of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP in L. G6pc −/− mice. h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP dose range: 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg. For b–e , quantitative data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 5, 7, 6, and 6 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). For statistical analysis, raw values were Log2 transformed and subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the eGFP mRNA treated group. Statistically significant P values ( p ≤ 0.05) are shown in the graphs. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against G6Pase-α were quantified on Nunc Immuno Maxisorp plates (ThermoFisher, #442404) coated with 0.5 μg/mL recombinant G6Pase-α protein (Viva Biotech) in 50 mM Na 2 CO 3 for 1 h at room temperature and blocked with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (ThermoFisher, #37515).

    Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Biomarker Discovery, Transformation Assay

    a Single-dose duration of action of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) administered i.v. in L. G6pc −/− mice. Blood glucose levels were measured at fed (0 h) or fasting conditions (2.5- or 6-h post-fasting). Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 9, 10, 10, and 10 mice per group for wild-type (WT) treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). For statistical analysis, two-sample t -test (two-sided) was performed and corrected for multiple testing by using a Bonferroni adjusted level of 0.005. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001, comparing h G6PC S298C mRNA 1.0 mg/kg with eGFP ( p values are 0.0017 [day 0, 2.5 h], 0.0016 [day 0, 6 h], 0.0006 [day 2, 2.5 h], 0.0005 [day 2, 6 h], 0.001 [day 4, 2.5 h], 0.001 [day 4, 6 h], and 0.048 [day 7, 6 h], respectively). † P ≤ 0.05, †† P ≤ 0.01, ††† P ≤ 0.001, †††† P ≤ 0.0001, comparing h G6PC S298C mRNA 0.5 mg/kg with eGFP ( p values are 0.033 [day 0, 2.5 h], 0.001 [day 0, 6 h], 0.0004 [day 2, 2.5 h], 0.00003 [day 2, 6 h], 0.002 [day 4, 2.5 h], 0.001 [day 4, 6 h], and 0.009 [day 7, 6 h], respectively) b Blood glucose levels following repeat (five doses) i.v. administrations of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP (0.25 mg/kg) in L. G6pc −/− mice. Arrows indicate dose administration. Blood glucose levels were measured at 2.5-h post-fasting. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 7, and 9 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with h G6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). For statistical analysis, two-sample t -test (two-sided) was performed and corrected for multiple testing by using a Bonferroni adjusted level of 0.005. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, *** P ≤ 0.0001 comparing hG6PC S298C mRNA with eGFP ( p values are 0.005 [day 11], 4 × 10 −6 [day 25], 0.0007 [day 28], 0.0192 [day38], 1.3 × 10 −5 [day 39], 0.001 [day 42], 2 × 10 −6 [day 52], and 5 × 10 −5 [day 53], respectively). c Serum proinflammatory cytokines (from left to right): IFNɣ, IL-1β, TNFα, and IL6 from the dose-ranging study. d serum ALT (mU/mL) levels from the dose-ranging study. For c and d , data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6, 5, 8, 7, and 6 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). e Serum proinflammatory cytokines (from left to right): IFNɣ, IL-1β, TNFα, and IL6 from repeat-dose study. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 10, 10, and 7 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, or hG6PC S298C mRNA). f Antidrug antibody assay measuring anti-G6Pase-α antibodies in sera of mice treated with five doses of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP (0.5 mg/kg). Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 9, 7, 7, 6 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L.G6 pc −/− treated with eGFP, L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA, and positive sera, respectively). g Body weight of L. G6pc −/− mice prior to each repeat i.v. dose treatment of h G6PC mRNA -LNP (0.25 mg/kg) for repeat dose study. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 7, and 9 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L.G6 pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). For statistical analysis of c–f , raw values were Log2 transformed and subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the eGFP mRNA treated group. P values are shown in the graphs ( c–f ). Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23318-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Single-dose duration of action of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg) administered i.v. in L. G6pc −/− mice. Blood glucose levels were measured at fed (0 h) or fasting conditions (2.5- or 6-h post-fasting). Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 9, 10, 10, and 10 mice per group for wild-type (WT) treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). For statistical analysis, two-sample t -test (two-sided) was performed and corrected for multiple testing by using a Bonferroni adjusted level of 0.005. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001, comparing h G6PC S298C mRNA 1.0 mg/kg with eGFP ( p values are 0.0017 [day 0, 2.5 h], 0.0016 [day 0, 6 h], 0.0006 [day 2, 2.5 h], 0.0005 [day 2, 6 h], 0.001 [day 4, 2.5 h], 0.001 [day 4, 6 h], and 0.048 [day 7, 6 h], respectively). † P ≤ 0.05, †† P ≤ 0.01, ††† P ≤ 0.001, †††† P ≤ 0.0001, comparing h G6PC S298C mRNA 0.5 mg/kg with eGFP ( p values are 0.033 [day 0, 2.5 h], 0.001 [day 0, 6 h], 0.0004 [day 2, 2.5 h], 0.00003 [day 2, 6 h], 0.002 [day 4, 2.5 h], 0.001 [day 4, 6 h], and 0.009 [day 7, 6 h], respectively) b Blood glucose levels following repeat (five doses) i.v. administrations of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP (0.25 mg/kg) in L. G6pc −/− mice. Arrows indicate dose administration. Blood glucose levels were measured at 2.5-h post-fasting. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 7, and 9 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with h G6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). For statistical analysis, two-sample t -test (two-sided) was performed and corrected for multiple testing by using a Bonferroni adjusted level of 0.005. * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, *** P ≤ 0.0001 comparing hG6PC S298C mRNA with eGFP ( p values are 0.005 [day 11], 4 × 10 −6 [day 25], 0.0007 [day 28], 0.0192 [day38], 1.3 × 10 −5 [day 39], 0.001 [day 42], 2 × 10 −6 [day 52], and 5 × 10 −5 [day 53], respectively). c Serum proinflammatory cytokines (from left to right): IFNɣ, IL-1β, TNFα, and IL6 from the dose-ranging study. d serum ALT (mU/mL) levels from the dose-ranging study. For c and d , data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6, 5, 8, 7, and 6 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA at 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). e Serum proinflammatory cytokines (from left to right): IFNɣ, IL-1β, TNFα, and IL6 from repeat-dose study. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 10, 10, and 7 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, or hG6PC S298C mRNA). f Antidrug antibody assay measuring anti-G6Pase-α antibodies in sera of mice treated with five doses of h G6PC S298C mRNA-LNP (0.5 mg/kg). Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 9, 7, 7, 6 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L.G6 pc −/− treated with eGFP, L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA, and positive sera, respectively). g Body weight of L. G6pc −/− mice prior to each repeat i.v. dose treatment of h G6PC mRNA -LNP (0.25 mg/kg) for repeat dose study. Data were presented as mean ± SD ( n = 8, 7, and 9 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L.G6 pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L. G6pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). For statistical analysis of c–f , raw values were Log2 transformed and subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the eGFP mRNA treated group. P values are shown in the graphs ( c–f ). Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against G6Pase-α were quantified on Nunc Immuno Maxisorp plates (ThermoFisher, #442404) coated with 0.5 μg/mL recombinant G6Pase-α protein (Viva Biotech) in 50 mM Na 2 CO 3 for 1 h at room temperature and blocked with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (ThermoFisher, #37515).

    Techniques: Transformation Assay

    a Number of mice with tumors (left), number of tumors per mouse (middle), and tumor burden/area (right). Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m ( n = 21, 26, and 34 mice per group for wild-type (WT) treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and hG6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). b Liver morphology (tumor-circled in yellow) (top panels) and liver histology (bottom panels) of WT and L. G6pc −/− mice treated with either eGFP mRNA or h G6PC S298C mRNAs. c HCA/HCC biomarkers (protein expression). Results are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 15, 27, and 35 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L.G6 pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). For statistical analysis, raw values were subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the eGFP mRNA treated group. Statistically significant P values ( p ≤ 0.05) are shown in the graphs. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: mRNA therapy restores euglycemia and prevents liver tumors in murine model of glycogen storage disease

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23318-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Number of mice with tumors (left), number of tumors per mouse (middle), and tumor burden/area (right). Data were presented as mean ± s.e.m ( n = 21, 26, and 34 mice per group for wild-type (WT) treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and hG6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). b Liver morphology (tumor-circled in yellow) (top panels) and liver histology (bottom panels) of WT and L. G6pc −/− mice treated with either eGFP mRNA or h G6PC S298C mRNAs. c HCA/HCC biomarkers (protein expression). Results are expressed as mean ± SD ( n = 15, 27, and 35 mice per group for WT treated with PBS, L. G6pc −/− treated with eGFP, and L.G6 pc −/− treated with hG6PC S298C mRNA, respectively). For statistical analysis, raw values were subjected to one-way ANOVA, followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared to the eGFP mRNA treated group. Statistically significant P values ( p ≤ 0.05) are shown in the graphs. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: Antibodies against G6Pase-α were quantified on Nunc Immuno Maxisorp plates (ThermoFisher, #442404) coated with 0.5 μg/mL recombinant G6Pase-α protein (Viva Biotech) in 50 mM Na 2 CO 3 for 1 h at room temperature and blocked with SuperBlock (PBS) Blocking Buffer (ThermoFisher, #37515).

    Techniques: Expressing